Talk:Thomas Coke (bishop)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Please DO NOT delete this article! The previous article on Thomas Coke was deleted because the material it contained was the copyright of an external organisation. This material in not copyright and it should be retained. The only reason the other article was deleted was the copyright issue. This is an entirely new article and not just a re-working of the old one.

Thank you!

Bishop or not bishop

edit

Hello friends,
Just a question after reading this article while working on the French Methodist missions. It's not clear to me from reading the text why the page should be entitled "Thomas Coke(bishop)". It looks as if he tried his best to become the first Methodist bishop but didn't succeed. If that is so, then an apter title could be "Thomas Coke(Methodist)"; if not, an improvement of the Coke's biography could clarifiy the when and how of his nomination as a bishop.
Pensées de Pascal (talk) 21:00, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Thomas Coke (bishop). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:37, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply