This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
He seems like an important scientist. To me, the intro makes it clear his (if marginal) significance. -- Taku (talk) 23:16, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Here is a link to a New York Times article quoting Hanks. And here he is called "a geophysicist and earthquake expert at the U.S. Geological Survey in Menlo Park" .J. Van Meter (talk) 02:07, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
One more: link to Hanks profile at " Princeton Alumni Weekly." J. Van Meter (talk) 02:29, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
I dont believe this guy is important enough to be on wikipedia, many people are quoted by journals that does not mean they should be in a Encyclopedia. I suggest this entry to be deleted. Simbioz (talk) 18:47, 28 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Why is he not important? Wikipedia should have a good coverage of prominent seismologists. Isn't he one of them? -- Taku (talk) 23:17, 28 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
