Talk:Thomas Brunner
 | Thomas Brunner has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 3, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Thomas Brunner/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Rosiestep (talk · contribs) 02:34, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
I'll review this one within the week. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:34, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Service with the New Zealand Company
- "In 1844" - add a comma
Done
- Later life
- "... but with the proviso that he would able to take on private work which did not interfere with his duties." This seems to be missing a word. Done
- Retirement and death
- "By mid-April 1874" - add a comma Done
@Zawed: This is a very well-written article which really draws in the reader. I found only nitpicky items to mention. Let me know when you want me to return to the review so that I can pass it. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:15, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
@Rosiestep: Firstly, thank you for taking the time to review this article, it is greatly appreciated. I have fixed the three issues that you have identified above so hopefully it is now satisfactory. Thanks again. Zawed (talk) 07:50, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Good job. Looks adequate for GA. --Rosiestep (talk) 13:07, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Geographic features edit
I've had a look whether the geographic features section is complete. It wasn't and I've added items as appropriate. There's also Brunner Glacier in Antarctica, but that's named after somebody else. What I couldn't figure out was the name origin for Mount Brunner (Q31668132) and the Brunner Col (Q32142679) nearby, both located on the Main Divide near Mount Sefton. It's not covered in my 2010 edition of Place Names of New Zealand and I could not find an online source that elaborated on these two features. Does anyone know? Is this covered by Emily Host's book? Schwede66 23:00, 3 March 2021 (UTC)