Talk:Thismia rodwayi
 | Thismia rodwayi received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
 | This article was edited to contain a total or partial translation of Thismia rodwayi from the French Wikipedia. Consult the history of the original page to see a list of its authors. (This notice applies to version 612624661 and subsequent versions of this page.) |
 | This article has been translated from a Wikipedia article in another language, and requires proofreading. |
Importance of Thismia rodwayi
edit@Plantdrew: Hi! Thank you for your edits!
I'd just like to talk about the importance of this article. I'm not trying to, like, impose my point of view, but I chose "Mid importance" using Category:Mid-importance taxonomic articles, which states "Typically, taxonomic genera and species would be of Mid importance".
So could you explain to me why you think it should be "Low importance"?
Thanks a lot,
Thouny(talk), on 08:31, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
@Thouny: Importance is pretty subjective, and choosing an importance isn't very well documented. WikiProject Plants importance and WikiProject Tree of Life importance are described in a sentence or two. The system of "genera and species would be of Mid importance" does not reflect typical practices. For plants, importance is typically Low for most genera and species. Importance of Mid or higher is usually for plant used by humans in some way, or plants with significant ecological impact. A typical wildflower is Low importance. I don't know, T. rodwayi might be of a little higher than usual human interest because of it's rarity, but I lean towards classifying it as Low importance. Plantdrew (talk) 03:39, 19 June 2014 (UTC)