Talk:Third Stone from the Sun/GA1

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Ojorojo in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 17:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply


Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  17:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, you're timeline works for me. —Ojorojo (talk) 19:59, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    "which parodies a science fiction scenario" - already linked
    "The guitar melody has been quoted in a number of different recorded songs, such as "Baby, Please Don't Go" (the Amboy Dukes, 1968),[10] "Mountain Jam" (the Allman Brothers, 1971), "Dance with the Devil" (Cozy Powell, 1973), "Rasputin" (Boney M. sampling Powell, 1978), "I'm Too Sexy" (Right Said Fred, 1991), and "Jimmy James" (Beastie Boys, 1992)." - is all of this covered in the source?
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    No original research found.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    NPOV
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

The article is comprehensive, well written, and all of the sources check out. It meets the criteria, so I'll pass it outright JAGUAR  15:36, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Jaguar. I have another GAN that should be easy, if you're interested. —Ojorojo (talk) 16:27, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply