Talk:Theory of War
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Sweetpool50 in topic Not an assessment, balanced or otherwise
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Not an assessment, balanced or otherwise
editThis is about the laziest, most unhelpful 'article' I have come across, largely dependent on what can be gathered from the covers of the novel. Other claims are made in references for which the links have long ceased to function and may well be commercially suspect puffery. A little basic punctuation would not come amiss either. I'll put it on my watch list and if it does not improve within a reasonable time, it seems a good candidate for deletion. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 00:40, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- Hi just seen the above, sorry for my laziness and unhelpfulness, will try and move stuff from the Joan Brady article to this one... GrahamHardy (talk) 05:12, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- I have moved stuff from the authors article but I still feel a bit peeved by being 'lazy' and 'unhelpful'... GrahamHardy (talk) 18:29, 8 October 2022
The description is of the article, not its editor. But the major discrepancy in punctuation after the editor's latest intrusion seems to prove the point! Sweetpool50 (talk) 18:51, 8 October 2022 (UTC)