Talk:Theoretical philosophy

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Epistemology / Logic Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Epistemology
	Logic

Removing a sentence edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This: "However, it should be noted that the division between practical and theoretical philosophy is generally only embraced in countries with a tradition of continental philosophy, and is hardly known in anglo-american academia" is not true, as far as I can tell. Sweden belongs firmly in the anglo-american analytic tradition and has basically no traditions of the continental variety of philosophy, but it is in Sweden that the distinction is the most pronounced. And where the continental traditions are the strongest (such as in France), there is no such division at all, that I know of. So I will remove this sentence unless someone has a good objection. Kronocide 15:33, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merge with Practical philosophy? edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

They are part of the same dichotomic classification. Brad7777 (talk) 13:51, 27 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic