Talk:Themes in Avatar/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 20:32, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Will review, starting tomorrow. Pyrotec (talk) 20:32, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Initial comments

• I've have a quick couple of skim-read throughs. At this stage the article appears to be comprehensive and well referenced. As such, I would expect it to make GA-status this time round. However, this is not the final decision; and I'm now starting a detailed review.

• It's worth noting that at this point in the review I will mostly listing "problems", so this part is possibly somewhat negative, but by the end of the review all points will have been covered. Pyrotec (talk) 09:22, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Looks well on its way to becoming FA to me... Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 11:45, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

A good GA: well-referenced, well-illustrated and comprehensive.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Well referenced.

   C. No original research:

   Well referenced.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

A very readable article at or beyond GA-level. I'm therefore awarding GA-status. Congratulations on producing a fine article. P.S. I must get the DVD from Amazon.

I tend to agree with Dr. Blofeld, its well on its way to being an WP:FAC. FAC is tough, but I do suggest that you submit it when you're are ready to WP:PR. Pyrotec (talk) 14:27, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

• Sorry, I see you've already done PR. Pyrotec (talk) 14:30, 18 April 2010 (UTC)