Talk:Theatre of Nero
Latest comment: 1 year ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Did you know nomination
![]() | A news item involving Theatre of Nero was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 30 July 2023. | ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:37, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the structures of the theatre of Nero in Rome have been found under the courtyard of Palazzo Della Rovere (pictured)? Source: [1]
- ALT1: ... that according to Pliny the theatre of Nero was used by the emperor for rehearsals of his exhibitions at the theatre of Pompey? Source: secondo Plinio Nerone riteneva sufficiente la capienza del teatro transtiberino solo per le prove di esibizioni che si sarebbero tenute poi in un ambiente assai più grande, cioè nel teatro di Pompeo
- Reviewed: I will do it ASAP
Created by Alessandro57 (talk). Self-nominated at 19:08, 26 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Theatre of Nero; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Article is new, both on the English and Italian Wikipedias. Sourcing mainly from books, but the sources that I was able to access freely are from trusted news sources such as Corriere della Sera. A quick glance of the source material in Corriere della Sera tells me that the translation to English is indeed accurate. Prose is long enough and meets NPOV requirements. Photograph leaves just a tad to be desired but considering it is an active excavation site, I imagine other sourced photos might be more difficult to provide at this time. When the artifacts are finally displayed, I think Wikipedia would do well to have some of these photographs in the article. Of course that is well into the future. My vote is . Mike H. Fierce! 15:45, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Now that the article is on ITN, does that preclude it from being featured again for DYK? It's been a while since I have nominated. Mike H. Fierce! 16:02, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- yup, it's ineligible now. BorgQueen (talk) 17:46, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Now that the article is on ITN, does that preclude it from being featured again for DYK? It's been a while since I have nominated. Mike H. Fierce! 16:02, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Images
editAre there any images of the archaeological finds? Golem08 (talk) 21:59, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- Free images, no. But I can ask my Wikipedian friends who are in Rome (I'm abroad at the moment) to drop by St. Peter's and take a couple of photos (if they will let them in). Alex2006 (talk) 07:12, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Great, thank you. Golem08 (talk) 20:28, 2 August 2023 (UTC)