Talk:The unexamined life is not worth living

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ancient philosophy

hi

Speciesism edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The assumptions made by some human lives for 'all life' are inherently speciesist. Has 'life examination' been examined phenomenologically to determine whether such a human 'mandate' is really morally normative across all sentient lifeforms - or only presumptive for human lives? MaynardClark (talk) 19:02, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Philosophy is born in wonder!

There is plenty of evidence that nonhuman sentient beings do wonder in awe! "Oooh! Ohhh!" MaynardClark (talk) 19:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC).Reply

Add topic