Talk:The Young Bull
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Editør in topic Move to The Young Bull
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Young Bull article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Move to The Young Bull edit
Although the owning museum uses just "The Bull" (in Dutch), most English sources use The Young Bull (now at least a redirect), and the article should probably be moved to that, also removing the need for the disam. Johnbod (talk) 18:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- I am not against it in principle, but the claim of "most English sources" needs citations first. – Editør (talk) 18:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Grove, Getty, Seymour Slive, the Royal Collection ([1]), Wallace Collection, the National Gallery (MacLaren) and other books all use that. How about you finding some equally authoritative native English-speaking sources that don't? Johnbod (talk) 21:00, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. If all English sources that you found call the painting The Young Bull, then your request of finding other sources serves no purpose and you can obviously change the name. If the main title is The Young Bull, the statement "more often..." can be removed. – Editør (talk) 09:51, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Grove, Getty, Seymour Slive, the Royal Collection ([1]), Wallace Collection, the National Gallery (MacLaren) and other books all use that. How about you finding some equally authoritative native English-speaking sources that don't? Johnbod (talk) 21:00, 3 May 2015 (UTC)