Talk:The Yellow Journal
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Manic clam in topic Largely unsourced
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis is a forum to discuss edits, changes and revisions to the article The Yellow Journal.
SCOTUS evidence
edit- In an effort to maintain some sort of documentation of info presented here, I modified recent edits/contributions by User: 71.191.179.109 regarding the YJ's 80s/90s revival. Specifically removed the paragraph regarding what article/issue/item was specifically referenced in the Supreme Court case. Seems unlikely (though not impossible) that an article from '87 would be used as evidence in '94-'95, especially since there was never a lack of "anti-christian" material in any given issue of the YJ. I would very much like to find out more info as to what YJ evidence was examined by the SCOTUS, and also what was presented on McNeil/Lehrer. I'm not a wiki W:RS stickler per se, just feel we need *even loosely* documented evidence of such. I also moved some of the student names to a new section "YJ Head Guys", but this is also undocumented and we need to verify dates. I feel it may also be appropriate to add a section on "YJ artists", or "Other Notable Alumni", but do not know of any nationally-notable (i.e-FAMOUS) contributors. StopTheSanity (talk) 21:20, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Largely unsourced
edit- This article is still largely unsourced. Additionally, the list of employees/volunteers seems out of place as per WP:NOT. I don't want to jump the gun, but given that it's been 10 months since the only comment here, I'm going to remove the list for now as it's not noteworthy.