Talk:The Wednesday Play

Image copyright problem with Image:Cathycomehome.JPG

The image Image:Cathycomehome.JPG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:37, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

"The Wednesday Play was a British television play" No, it was a series of plays. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gowt (talk • contribs) 16:44, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Problematic edit

This edit, apparently by David Benedictus, was added to the article earlier today. Despite not being written in the Wikipedia house style, now corrected, it is highly authoritative, but is always likely to stand out from the rest. A season by season breakdown is likely to be tedious to read, and only this admittedly useful site takes such an approach. It does not appear to be based on an 'official' source as to a breakdown though.

I am trying to build up an article based on personnel, the Loach-Garnett section simply benefits from a good deal of easily accessible source material on the web, and Peter Luke's involvement in seasons 1, 4 & 5, following the just cited website, is somrething which needs to be developed if the article is to be as comprehensive as the series deserves. Philip Cross (talk) 19:17, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

The War Game

I cut back the reference to this programme to allow the inclusiuon of more details into the paragraph. I did not cut anything which is absent from the linked Wikipedia article. Philip Cross (talk) 18:39, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Up the Junction film

A few days ago, the article read: "The success of Up the Junction led to a 1968 cinematic version, setting a trend for film versions of successful or controversial BBC television plays that would continue for some years." This is inaccurate, "successful" television dramas in the UK had been turned into films for some years, think Quatermass, so I cut it. "Controversial" is wrong too, the 1954 television version of 1984 received strong responses, and was followed by a UK cinema version. So a removal of the sentence looks entirely legitimate. Philip Cross (talk) 12:48, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Cathy Come Home caption

In this edit I reverted another editor's change. In January 1966, almost a year before the first broadcast, there were 17,8 million homes (households) in the UK of which 15.4 million possessed a TV set. (See here.) So less than 90% penetration, but still substantial enough in a mere three-channel environment for Cathy Come Home to have had the impact on public debate sources indicate. Philip Cross (talk) 07:58, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

The first two transmission were seen by 11.8 and 12 million viewers respectively. Roger Graef asserts here that the later figure was 24% of the population at the time. I think he must mean the percentage to refer to the adult population at the time, possibly this is a Guardian sub-editing gaffe. The 1961 census found the total UK population to be 52.8 million while both the first two broadcasts were at 21.05 (16 November 1966 and 11 January 1967, see the BBC Genome website) obviously just after the 9pm watershed which had been introduced a few years earlier. Philip Cross (talk) 15:39, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Wednesday Play. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131022124024/http://www.prixitalia.rai.it/2010/pdf/WINNERS_1949-2010.pdf to http://www.prixitalia.rai.it/2010/pdf/WINNERS_1949-2010.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Wednesday Play. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718075448/http://www.tvcream.co.uk/?cat=2693 to http://www.tvcream.co.uk/?cat=2693

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:58, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Number of Seasons

The article currently identifies six seasons (one per year), while the detailed external site [1] identifies nine seasons (splitting the first three runs into two seasons each) and one special before Season 9. This may be a mis-interpretation of wording in the Radio Times, but could be clarified by reference to production documentation. It is further complicated by the inclusion of several productions 'flown in' from other sources or postponed. CaptainZond (talk) 11:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)