Talk:The Way I Loved You (Taylor Swift song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Gained (talk · contribs) 04:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 08:58, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

I will review this fully today! --K. Peake 08:58, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Infobox looks good both times!
• "She wrote the track with John Rich and produced it" → "She wrote the song with John Rich and served as a producer"
• ""The Way I Loved You" is about" → "it is about"
• Remove pipe on country since contemporary country is linked in the same sentence, making this come across as a WP:OVERLINK
• "snare drum and loud and subtle" → "snare drum, and loud and subtle"
• Make the reception sentence the first one of the second para instead
• Add a comma after Hot 100 and mention that the certification was in the United States
• "the United States," → "the US," per MOS:US on mentions after the first instances
• "received certifications from" should be a new sentence saying "The song received platinum and silver certifications in Australia and the United Kingdom from the..." and then mention the two certification organizations, respectively
• "The re-recorded track received mostly positive comments" → "The re-recording received mostly positive reviews"

Background and writing

• "contain autobiographical themes," → "contains autobiographical themes,"
• "said that Rich "was able to relate to it because" → "said that Rich managed to be relatable "because" to avoid overquoting and re-invoke the ref at the end of each of these sentences that use direct quotes
• "she is with her audience." → "she was with her audience."
• "her and Nathan Chapman and" → "her and Nathan Champman, and"

Releases

• Img looks good!
• Remove link on Fearless and mention the position of the track on the album
• Mention that the certification was in the United States
• Remove overly obvious link on Lisbon since this is a capital city
• Second para looks good!
• "with peaks of 94[21] and 24,[22]" → "with peaks at numbers 94[21] and 24,[22]"
• Mention the two countries those certifications were in

Music and lyrics

• ""The Way I Loved You" is a" → "Musically, "The Way I Loved You" is a"
• "oriented country[4] and rock" → "oriented country, rock" and I would suggest moving all of these refs to the end of the sentence as the order generally lines up with info here
• Invoke the ref for the Slant Magazine sentence
• "believed that the song was" → "believed that the song is"
• Wikilink as tempo instead
• [32][33][34] is numerically ordered, so please move them all to the end of the sentence
• Audio sample looks good!
• "Emily Lee from iHeartRadio claimed that" → "Emily Lee from iHeartRadio felt that"
• Is 1990s grudge a typo from the source? If so, end the speech marks at take" and then write out 1990s grunge

Critical reception

• "and wrote that the production was" → "and that the production was"
• "evoked her previous "Avril Lavigne-esque sneer [...] hits" but" → "evoked Swift's previous "Avril Lavigne-esque sneer [...] hits", but"
• "delightfully dramatic" [...] which," → "delightfully dramatic – which,"
• "was devoid of "radio-ready hooks and megawatt" → "is devoid of radio-friendly hooks and "megawatt"
• "gave it "new life"." → "give it "new life"."
• Remove link on Vulture

Personnel

• Why is Nathan Chapman not listed as a producer?
• Maybe align the first credits to the left and the second to the right?

Charts

• Good

Certifications

• Shouldn't this section follow the previous one's blueprint of having the separate tables and captions rather than sub-sections especially since the first version only had one certification?

Note

• Good

References

• Copyvio score looks safe at 23.1%!!!!
• Ref 1 should cite the original URL (https://www.songwriteruniverse.com/taylorswift123.htm) with the archived link rather than the homepage of the website and the current duplicate of the same URL and fix MOS:QWQ issues
• Replace ref 7 and 18's people parameter with the others parameter
• Cite MTV as publisher instead on ref 11
• I am confused by ref 14; the original URL is CNN but the archive is CTV News, which one are you meaning to cite?

Sources

• Good

Final comments and verdict

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed; this article is mostly smooth though! --K. Peake 11:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC)