Talk:The Video Collection 93:99/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Adabow in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:57, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  


More great work from you, Legolas. Just a few comments (not GA stuff though):

  • I gave the 'Formats' section a quick copy-edit. Please make sure that you're happy with it.
  • 'Warner Music Vision' in the lead could be wikified; why is it mentioned as this in the lead and as 'Warner Bros. Records' later on?
  • Could some screenshot(s) of music videos be placed alongside critical comments to further describe her images referred to?
  • For consistency, chart positions (especially under 100) are usually spelt out.