Talk:The Thriving Cult of Greed and Power/GA1

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

GA pass

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Well-written? Yes; strong conformity to MoS.
Factually accurate and verifiable? Extensive use of inline citations.
Broad? Provides excellent coverage of the article from many angles (context, analysis, fallout, etc.).
Netural? Surprisingly even-handed for an article documenting a controversy.
Stable? Appears to be.
Illustrated? A bit light on illustrations, but it's a difficult topic to illustrate. Kudos to whatever creative mind thought to scan the official judicial entries/documents and use them.

This is a great article, in my opinion, and I would recommend upping the ante to Featured Article ~~review~~ candidacy. I'm sure they'll find plenty of holes for you to revise, but this article isn't far off. Dylan 23:27, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. I especially appreciated your statement above: Netural? Surprisingly even-handed for an article documenting a controversy. Cirt 00:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC).
- Ah. Thank you for that clarification. Cirt 00:50, 4 November 2007 (UTC).