Talk:The Theologians
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Wickedjacob in topic I restored to an earlier version
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
This reads more like an original research analysis or a magazine type review than it should. The plot and major characters, etc. are missing, a great many analytical claims are made and undocumented and unreferenced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.100.188.193 (talk) 23:00, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
I restored to an earlier version edit
Despite its issues, this version is much more informative than nothing at all. Fixing the article and adding citations, not blanking it, is the appropriate strategy if someone has an issue with it. Wickedjacob (talk) 11:14, 3 August 2015 (UTC)