Talk:The Texas Chain Saw Massacre/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Good article reassessment
I've nominated the article to be reassessed or delisted as a good article. See discussion here. —97198 talk 13:09, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- I was sorry to close this as delist just as improvement is beginning. Good luck with the renomination. Geometry guy 22:28, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, it's currently awaiting review. Just to let anybody know, I'll be taking a vacation from July 24 to August 19, so if anything major happens to the article (e.g. GA suceeded, FA candidate), I would like to know about it, even though I might not be editing Wikipedia, just some info for when I get back. Not that I'm claiming ownership or anything like that. Cheers, --EclipseSSD (talk) 18:23, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
GA Review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Texas Chain Saw Massacre/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
I'm gonna review this soon Intothewoods29 (talk) 03:59, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Okay, well I'm going to say this is a GA! I cleaned up a bit of punctuation (commas mainly) but you might want to go over a few times before FA nomination. It passes all of the criteria.
1. Well-written, flows well, easy to follow, no jargon, good grammer
2. Tons of refs, reliable
3. Stays on topic, addresses everything in the topic
4. NPOV
5. Stable
6. All pics have tags and are useful (and creepy)
Some suggestions for FA: make sure everything has a ref listed (end of the financing section), and double-check grammer... and anything else you can think of.
Good job! Intothewoods29 (talk) 04:28, 30 July 2008 (UTC)