Talk:The Sparrow (novel)

How the Book Became SF

This is going to be hard to document but I was working in a bookstore when it all played out. This book was released as a non-genre fiction novel. Yes, it had two alien races and interstellar travel but the publisher put "fiction" on the cover and it was shelved all over the country in the fiction sections of bookstores. It was widely mentioned that the publisher discouraged Russell from mentioning any SF influences in interviews. The nature of the book led to its not selling all that well on the shelves alongside mainstream fiction. After awhile, people started to shelve it in their F&SF sections and, what do you know, it sold better from there. Something fairly similar happened with William Goldman's _The Princess Bride_ But there was more reason not to shelve it with F&SF because it seemed more reasonable to shelve it with his other work. However it, too, started to sell when it was re-shelved. Will in New Haven —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.186.154.139 (talk) 16:12, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:TheSparrow(1stEd).jpg

Image:TheSparrow(1stEd).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

The Sparrow and A Case of Conscience

There have been a couple of recent reverts regarding the title of this section. Since there is no clear reference for plagiarism I believe that the title of this section should be The Sparrow and A Case of Conscience. Does anyone have any references to support defining this as plagiarism? Captain-tucker (talk) 01:45, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

I agree with you, and I would prefer there to be no direct statement of plagiarism. Tb (talk) 03:18, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

I agree as well. I have read both books and there seems to be only a superficial similarity. I've never heard of there being any controversy over it. --Etacar11 06:23, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

I reverted the heading back to "The Sparrow and A Case of Conscience" --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:41, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

I again reverted the heading back to "The Sparrow and A Case of Conscience" --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:30, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Sparrow (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090417194828/http://homepages.roadrunner.com:80/druss44121/faqs.htm to http://homepages.roadrunner.com/druss44121/faqs.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:13, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Sparrow (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080416202714/http://www.epilog.de/Dokumente/Preise/SF/Lasswitz/2001/Index.html to http://www.epilog.de/Dokumente/Preise/SF/Lasswitz/2001/Index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:02, 22 January 2018 (UTC)