Talk:The Series Finale/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Favre1fan93 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 14:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Remove the comma after "Wanda Maximoff's chaos magic".
  • Add a serial comma after "re-assembled" (American English).
  • Also remove the comma after "Maximoff's magic".
  • "survived development of the episode" – reword
  • Add hyphens between "fine tune" and "self acceptance".
  • "before beung changed" – typo
  • "labelling" → "labeling" (American English)
  • "eratic-looking" – typo
  • Add a comma after "In some instances".
  • "this episodes" – typo
  • "given freedom" → "given the freedom"
  • WP:RECEPTION: More reviews, less quotes.
  • "CHris Gridley" – typo
  • Be consistent with The Art of VFX and Art of VFX.
  • Mark references from Vanity Fair with "|url-access=limited".
    • @Some Dude From North Carolina: Did you mean to pass this one yet? No one has addressed the issues you brought up. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:42, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
    • Please ignore that last comment. I don't know where my brain is at. I thought these comments were new for the 14th, not from the 11th, and Adamstom.97 addressed your comments. Apologies and thanks for reviewing all the WandaVision nominations! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:49, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed