Talk:The Republican War on Science

James Hansen

If discussion of Hansen and his works were a signficant part of the book, then yes. Mention on 4 pages (as the anon reports), no. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:06, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

James Hansen is a key part of this book, as an example, thus include.

• http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/censoring-science-mark-bowen/1008245314 Editorial review by Jeffrey Beall of the Library Journal
• http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=17926941 NPR

are an examples of connection and relevance of

• Bowen, Mark (2008). Censoring Science: Inside the Political Attack on Dr. James Hansen and the Truth of Global Warming. New York: Dutton. ISBN 978-0525-95014-1.

to this bigger picture book. 99.35.13.202 (talk) 01:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Those articles don't mention The Republican War on Science, only Censoring Science and James Hansen. If The Republican War on Science were a significant part of Censoring Science, then some connection might be appropriate. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:17, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

http://www.amazon.com/Republican-War-Science-Chris-Mooney/dp/0465046754 ... pages 18, 61, 245 and Index, of this book mention James Hansen. 99.181.146.21 (talk) 07:42, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Three mentions in a 376-page book? — Arthur Rubin (talk) 14:37, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

resource?

Jonathan Dudley's Broken Words: The Abuse of Science and Faith in American Politics ISBN-13: 978-0385525268

Amazon.com's Product Description ...

Growing up as an evangelical Christian, Jonathan Dudley was taught that abortion is murder, homosexuality sin, evolution nonsense, and environmentalism a farce. He learned to accept these conclusions--the "big four"--as part of the package deal of Christianity. Yet, when he began studying biology at the evangelical Calvin College and theology at Yale Divinity School, Dudley's views started to change. He soon realized that what he had been told about the Bible--and those four big issues involving scripture and biology--may have been misconstrued and that what so many Christians believe about key social and political issues may be wrong. ... And he surveys how evangelicals are changing their minds about environmentalism, and how this development supports a new way of thinking about the Bible. Throughout the book, Dudley, now an M.D. student at The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, also illustrates the scientific problems with popular evangelical views. In the process, he lays the groundwork for a new generation of post-Religious Right evangelical political activists, who believe in evolution, rally behind the environmental movement, are moderate on abortion, and support gay marriage--and who are more faithful to orthodox Christianity than their counterparts.

97.87.29.188 (talk) 20:33, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Related on general topic, but not specific to this book, unless it mentions it, I'd assume. 99.119.128.87 (talk) 00:18, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Maybe it would be useful in Politics of the United States? 99.190.87.183 (talk) 05:56, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

What about in Conservatism in the United States? 99.35.15.199 (talk) 01:24, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

resource? Or a better wp article?

Fool Me Twice: Fighting the Assault on Science in America by Shawn Lawrence Otto ISBN-13: 978-1605292175 publisher Rodale Books (October 11, 2011) 99.190.87.173 (talk) 20:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

current context from 2020 Pulitzer finalist NYT RSs, add?

Pulitzer Prize for Public Service finalist series:

• Finalist: The New York Times; For exemplary reporting that exposed the breadth and impact of a political war on science, including systematic dismantling of federal regulations and policy. Pulitzer.org

X1\ (talk) 09:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC)