This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reference works, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Reference worksWikipedia:WikiProject Reference worksTemplate:WikiProject Reference worksReference works articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of orders, decorations, and medals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Orders, decorations, and medalsWikipedia:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsTemplate:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsOrders, decorations, and medals articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The word 'Congressional' in the description of the United States Medal of Honour is incorrect. Correct description is simply 'The Medal of Honour'.82.36.194.190 16:39, 19 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I have removed the sentence "and the merest glimpse of that distinctive crimson ribbon on the brest of a veteran is sufficient to establish him as a military monarch in the minds of his fellow men, and nothing short of a god in the eyes of schoolboys throughout the world." as it is not encyclopedic in nature and basically non NPOV.
I have revised the first sentence of the section headed "The Victoria Cross", as it was inaccurate and suggested that the medal is some kind of competition or ranking. For example, the criteria for the Canadian VC are described as follows:"The Victoria Cross shall be awarded for the most conspicuous bravery, a daring or pre-eminent act of valour or self-sacrifice or extreme devotion to duty, in the presence of the enemy." After any single military action, one or none or more than one VC could in theory be awarded. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Markcymru (talk • contribs) 16:23, 2 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The article needs a lot a work but this correction would be more suitable for the article Ernest Sykes (VC) where the date is stated as 9 April 1917. It would be helpful to note that the action for which Ernest Sykes was awarded the VC is listed in official records and in many reference works, including The Register of the Victoria Cross as 19 April 1917. Other reference works indicate the correct day was Easter Monday, 9 April 1917 the start of the Battle of Arras. Anthony Staunton (talk) 14:40, 5 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
