Talk:The Queen of Air and Darkness

Latest comment: 4 years ago by D A Patriarche in topic Witch in the Wood comparison

Image copyright problem with Image:Once future king cover.jpg edit

The image Image:Once future king cover.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:59, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Recommendation to rename article edit

I would like to suggest we go with "The Witch In The Wood" since that is the original title of the novel, whereas "The Queen of Air and Darkness" is a later and much more concise reprint with virtually the same text. Furthermore, the article makes use of the book cover for "Witch", rather than "Queen", so it should naturally come to fold with one another. This is also to avoid confusion with the upcoming third installment (entitled "Queen of Air and Darkness") in Cassandra Clare's The Dark Artifices trilogy. Zach (talk) 13:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

agree strongly, this would also avoid confusion with the Poul Anderson novelette of the same name. Surely the usual procedure would be to have an article under the original title, describing both versions, and pointing to the final fixup (iirc) in The Once and Future King? --D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 14:51, 2 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Title source edit

The source given for the title - Housman - is primary & may be OR. The dag page for "The Queen..." links to Shakespeare's Queen Mab amongst several others although I don't find the title in the speech from the play. The Mab article implies she is a folkloric figure -- perhaps the title comes from the lore? In any case we need a secondary source to say authoritatively White was quoting Housman (or whoever) NB: Check the other articles with this title per dag page --D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 15:39, 2 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Witch in the Wood comparison edit

Regardless of whether the artice title is changed, it would be an improvement if the differences between TWITW &TQOAAD were described, possibly also the version in The Once and Future King if that is substantially different. Don't have access to the first two at the moment -- in any case that would be OR wouldn't it? --D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 16:05, 2 June 2019 (UTC)Reply