Talk:The Presidents of the United States of America (band)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Harmarsh16 in topic Gump

Improvements

edit

I was thinking that articles for Basitar and Guitbass would be good - I don't know enough about such instrumentation to write the articles myself but i'll create links for someone else to make an article for. MagicBez 18:18, 10 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

I, too, would like to know more about them. But, I don't. Whatever shall I do?Atinoda 05:44, 24 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
I think that Chris B. created the Guitbass, or perhaps both, with the late Mark Sandman. Kidney Stone 12:38, 11 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
Mark Sandman was switching guitar and bass strings back and forth since at least the mid to early 1980's w/ Treat Her Right. Ballew learned the technique from MS. Youspeakmylanguage 22:17, 31 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
I was thinking of creating just such an article, thought it would be my first and would probably be doomed to stub status for a while. Still, worth it, I think. Harmarsh16 (talk) 02:57, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speaking of the basitar, this photo strongly suggests that its two strings are in the D and B positions, not A and D. Joamiq (talk) 07:56, 23 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

I disagree, if that was a regular guitar strung with two strings the way his is it would be D and G. Look at the tuning pegs present. Top peg furthest away on any guitar is the D string and bottom peg furthest away is for the G string. This is the way it is strung in that photo.--109.150.133.61 (talk) 21:50, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply


Moved here from article, dunno if of any value:

PUSA IS NOT AN EMO BAND. Alternative would suffice. They don't want to nor whine about how they are in love with their best friend whose dog died when they were 6.

Stan 14:48, 24 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Seems like there's no reason for random bashing to exist.Atinoda 05:43, 24 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Albums

edit

In 2004, PUSA I and Freaked Out & Small were re-released, with significant extra material. They have been added. -- Broken Arms Gordon 02:35, 8 October 2005 (UTC)Reply


edit

The rareties wiki link is broken..it leads to an album by Roxette Flyerhell 22:30, 14 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

What happened in 1992?

edit

The first section of the Biography section is title "Early years and rise to fame (1992-1998)" however it states that the band was only formed in late 1992. No other reference to 1992 appears. Did anything relating to the band happen in 1992 or should section read "Early years and rise to fame (1993-1998)"? Canderra 04:44, 17 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Aftermath? Of what?

edit

"Aftermath (2000-present)" doesn't really seem to be an adequate way to describe this era of the band's history. "Reformation" would probably do a better job. I'm changing it, unless anyone has any particular qualms about it. Artiste-extraordinaire 11:08, 8 April 2006 (UTC) I see no problem with it, i actually agree. "aftermath" is something id use to describe kurt cobain or jimi hendrix people with untimley deaths that completly ended the bands.Reply

Naming inconsistency

edit

Why is it that this article is named "The" Presidents when other articles, such as Bloodhound Gang omit the "The"? See the issue explained in the manual of style, specifically Wikipedia:Naming conventions (definite and indefinite articles at beginning of name). GilliamJF 15:58, 16 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

That page also has naming conventions for bands which officially use "The," PUSA included. S.O. E-L-I-Z-A (YB3) T@lk/contribs 02:18, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reply to "Naming inconsistency"

edit

I think the band would prefer "the" because they were a strange band and they werent just Presidents, they were THE Presidents! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Giraffe luver-2024 (talkcontribs) 03:33, 16 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Gump

edit

Should Weird Al's parody "Gump" be mentioned? It does show how popular they were.

I think so, I recall Chamillionaire, who did "Ridin' Dirty", said that was his first sort of realization that he was big was when Weird Al did a parody of his song recently. But was it an indication of their overall popularity or the popularity of that one song? They did disappear for a bit after that album, no? Chewbacca1010 02:43, 11 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
This should definitely be added to the article. Harmarsh16 (talk) 02:58, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

How they currently play

edit

I don't think they play with Basitars or guitbasses anymore, I watched a video of them on youtube and they had a bassist. Here is the video (Uploaded by the band):

http://youtube.com/watch?v=XFdErzVgHlY&feature=PlayList&p=19640FCC5552DFBD&index=1&fmt=18 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.21.64.23 (talk) 00:52, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

This was a one off show with Duff McKagan on Bass Guitar. He occassionally jammed with them, during this time period. This video is from the Freaked Out and Small tour back in the early 2000's. Dave Dederer was on guitar, and he's not in the band anymore. When I saw them play in 2004 (for the Love Everybody tour), they still played Guitbass and Basitar. Phefner (talk) 16:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Apolitical?

edit

I understand that the band's lyrics are generally silly and uninterested in current events, but it seems odd to describe them as "apolitical" right before discussing the fact that they've in some way supported three of the last four Democratic presidential nominees. What do you think? 68.183.195.100 (talk) 07:32, 27 February 2009 (UTC)TremorMiloReply

which is better peaches or lump

edit

I have to say they are both good songs. Lump and peaches are both a little funny (and random). Which do you think is better? I personally like peaches but what do you think? please commentScreendoortotheextreme (talk) 14:31, 25 April 2009 (UTC)Reply


Reply to "which is better peaches or lump"

edit

I seriosly prefer lump because im am scarred for life and cannot listen to peaches. A few yrs ago in my class all of the boys would always sing it and they sounded so horrible that I couldent stand it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Giraffe luver-2024 (talkcontribs) 03:38, 16 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Non-free Image?

edit

Current version of the page says regarding band image appearing in the infobox, "The image above is believed to be a replaceable non-free image. It will be deleted on 2010-04-06 if not determined to be irreplaceable. If you believe this image is not replaceable, follow the instructions on the image page to dispute this assertion." I see nothing on the image page regarding this assertion, so I assume the image is no longer considered non-free, and the warning can be removed from the article. Any comments whether it is safe to do so? I'll do so if there are no objections. Oswald Glinkmeyer (talk) 19:02, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

"the presidents of the usa" in google goes to this page where as "presidents of the usa" goes to the list of us presidents. I create a dablink at the top of this page to reflect. --96.49.226.123 (talk) 05:44, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Grammy nominations and any other awards

edit

I think it should be mentioned that the band were nominated twice for Grammys. This would prove how successful they were and were at the pinnacle of their career in the 90s.

The first was for: The Presidents of the United States of America in the 1996 Grammy Award for Best Alternative Music Performance.

The second was for: "Peaches" in the 1997 Grammy Award for Best Pop Performance By A Duo or Group With Vocal.

Source: CD Universe

 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesterc27 (talkcontribs) 16:31, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply 

Early names

edit

They were referred to on local radio as 'All the dead presidents of the united states' early on, but I can't find a reference to that now. Has anyone seen that version of their name? 174.62.69.11 (talk) 08:44, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Presidents of the United States of America (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:31, 27 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Presidents of the United States of America (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply