Talk:The People's Voice (internet TV station)

Improvements made/needed edit

I have adjusted citations to use actual title and dates, mainly for successful WP:linkrot recovery. Also copyedited for clarity and cleaned up the two footnote/ref combos. Going forward, the "Importance" section needs to cite independent sources making those points. Wikipedia does not make pronouncements: only the sources do. --Lexein (talk) 21:21, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Intention section edit

Obviously, this is going to be tough to write and really be neutral, and to find sources to support the rewrite. The recent attempt [1] was unsourced and rather non-neutral. I'm leaning toward deleting the section tomorrow, and not reinstating it until academic or media analysis sources write about TPV. It's been more than 5 days without improvement. --Lexein (talk) 14:26, 14 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Importance section edit

I mainly wrote the section about the relevance because of the "speedy deletion" procedure, which gave as motivation the lack of such mention (of the relevance). For me it is fine to remove it. --Oakwood (talk) 16:21, 14 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

We still need to find RS and add prose demonstrating importance of the subject. I haven't found anything yet, so the article is still at risk of deletion on those grounds, sorry to say. --Lexein (talk) 22:08, 28 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Being wound up? edit

Looks like it is being wound up https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/2167468 "Notice is hereby given, pursuant to Section 98 of the Insolvency Act 1986 that a meeting of the creditors of the above-named Company will be held at 25 Harley Street, London W1G 9BR, on 23 July 2014, at 12.00 noon for the purposes mentioned in Sections 99, 100 and 101 of the said Act, to receive a statement of the Company’s affairs, to nominate one or more Insolvency Practitioner/s as Liquidator/s, and to consider the appointment of a Liquidation Committee. "

Someone who knows more about wiki may want to add it.

Can we obtain a better closing date than Mid[sic] 2014? edit

The closing date is far too vague. In the absence of a precise date, maybe use the date of the company being formally wound up? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TuringBox (talkcontribs) 00:51, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Reply