Talk:The Other Conquest

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Bagabondo in topic Too long and almost zero sources

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Other Conquest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Too long and almost zero sources edit

The film here has a lot of the same problems as its director's article, and both appear to have been written by the director himself. Both also have self-promotional "peacock" language.

Since almost all of the information here has no sources or citations, and appears to have been sourced by the director itself (therefore self-promotional), I will go ahead and remove all the information without citation. Almost all of the information here appears unfit for Wikipedia's policies of verifiability WP:V, no original research WP:OR, and neutral point of view WP:NPOV. Bagabondo (talk) 03:14, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Many of the issues with this article are the same as the one for its director (see: Talk:Salvador_Carrasco), so I will be brief: almost all of the information returned here is sourceless, and the information that does have sources go to dead links (including all the reviews from the "top critics"). I will remove all of that info right away.
Also, this new editor @Alcirengifo115 is evidently associated with the director of this film (again, see: Talk:Salvador_Carrasco), so his contributions that he has spammed with the summary "I am a Rotten Tomatoes-approved film critic conducting research on Mr. Carrasco's film and this is accurate, verified information that should be included in his profile page." will also be deleted (note how the editor forgot to remove the 'profile page' part for his contributions for this article).
I will say again: Wikipedia is not meant to be a promotional profile that anyone and their friends can fluff up for their own self-promotion, and this includes a person's work. Bagabondo (talk) 04:47, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply