Talk:The Original of Laura

hoax

"The Original of Laura" is not a work of Nabokov, but a hoax by Jeff Edmunds (ZEMBLA). See Salon.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.186.65.93 (talk • contribs) 15:18, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

The work is real. The hoax being referred to is the Desommelier article. Dancter 17:15, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

The "Original Of Laura" is not a hoax, it's Nabokov's handwriting. BJ —Preceding unsigned comment added by BSNJ07 (talk • contribs) 02:48, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Decision to publish

apparently -- NPR says as I write -- dmitri nabakov is goign to publish it-- not hoax. The number of cards is I think 128 --anyway more than is given on the wikipedia page -- Pmargul842 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.5.71 (talk) 21:55, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Indeed you are correct! We need to update this article quickly! --JayHenry (talk) 03:10, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Interesting -- I looked the story up on NPR and it actually says 138 index cards, but both the Guardian and New York Times say 50. I'm wondering how there could be such a discrepancy? --JayHenry (talk) 03:15, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

They say 50 because they don't have their facts right. BJ —Preceding unsigned comment added by BSNJ07 (talk • contribs) 02:49, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

"Nabokov weighed in on Nikolai Gogol's decision to burn the sequels to Dead Souls." - Okeh, but did he weigh in in favor of or against burning? that's key to including this point.Kdammers (talk) 12:42, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Vera Caspary

Could this book have inspired the novel Laura by Vera Caspery? --194.81.33.7 (talk) 18:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Unlikely. I do not see the connection. Laura was written in the 1940s, decades prior to when Nabokov would have started writing The Original of Laura before his death in 1977. As this article states, the meaning of the term "The Original" is also unclear. Arsonal (talk) 18:57, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Redundant paragraph redundancies

Philip Wild, an enormously corpulent scholar, is married to a slender, flighty and wildly promiscuous woman called Flora. Flora initially appealed to Wild because of another woman that he’d been in love with, Aurora Lee. Death and what lies beyond it, a theme which fascinated Nabokov from a very young age, are central. The book opens at a party and there follow four continuous scenes, after which the novel becomes more fragmented. It is not clear how old Wild is, but he is preoccupied with his own death and sets about obliterating himself from the toes upwards through meditation. A sort of deliberate self-inflicted self-erasure.

According to Newsnight, The Original of Laura "apparently concerns a portly academic called Philip Wild, and Flora, his much slimmer, 'wildly promiscuous' wife. Flora catches Wild's eye because of her resemblance to a young woman he had once been in love with. Wild is preoccupied by his own mortality, and resolves to obliterate himself from the toes upward, through the power of meditation."[3]

This second paragraph seems like it could be erased entirely as it just repeats the previous. WesUGAdawg (talk) 21:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

However, it is a(nother) validly sourced synopsis. I think it's appropriate to leave it in.Derekbd (talk) 04:34, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

I agree that it should be deleted. Apart from slight changes in the wording, the "Newsnight" quote is just a shortened version of the previous one. All it really tells you is that "Newsnight" thought its publication was newsworthy.Jon Rob (talk) 09:26, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Incidentally, the title of this section is surely itself an example of redundancy!Jon Rob (talk) 09:36, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

According to Newsnight "Incidentally, the title of this section is surely itself an example of redundancy!" WesUGAdawg (talk) 21:51, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Now that the book has been published, we can write our own summary without relying on previously published summaries. This will be a more effective way of transmitting the information.--Cúchullain ^t/c 13:13, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks to whoever fixed this.WesUGAdawg (talk) 21:58, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Unconvincing statements

The opening paragraph says "Before 1977, its contents had been viewed only by Nabokov's son, wife, and a few scholars." This appears to be inconsistent with the rest of the story. Should this sentence not commence "Before 2009,..."  ?Eregli bob (talk) 22:01, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Original of Laura. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090320142940/http://etc.dal.ca/noj/volume2/articles/05_StringerDNabokov.pdf to http://etc.dal.ca/noj/volume2/articles/05_StringerDNabokov.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:38, 10 January 2016 (UTC)