Talk:The Only Three Questions That Count

I did not create the page, but I removed the previous delete message because this page appears to meet Wikipedia criteria, particularly since I edited it to be more NPOV. User Plecech has a history of arbitrarily nominating financial pages for deletion. This seems abusive and not in the spirit of Wikipedia.

This page is similar to articles for other books. See The Intelligent Investor andFreakonomics. Netsumdisc 16:20, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

This book meets Wikipedia:Notability (books) criteria. I have edited it to address any NPOV concerns. Please see WP:FAITH. Netsumdisc 16:37, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Cleanup

I've reworked the article a bit, removing some parts which looked a bit too promotional. It's still a bit too much of a marketing piece though. For further improvement, I recommend that the article summarize some of the information from the book's reviews, both good and bad, to show how it was received. --Elonka 23:44, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:OTQTC thumb.jpg

Image:OTQTC thumb.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:57, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Removing source

Removing one source as unverifiable and some editorializing. Netsumdisc (talk) 01:20, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Source is back. Removing vandalism[1] and spam. Netsumdisc (talk) 02:01, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

"3 quesitons that count" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 3 quesitons that count. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Reyk _YO! 21:16, 3 November 2019 (UTC)