Talk:The Mountain Eagle/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Smarojit (talk · contribs) 15:15, 19 August 2013 (UTC) Will be reviewing it in the next couple of days. --smarojit ^HD 15:15, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Excellent work Dr. Blofeld. Especially wonderful is the hilarious production section. Couldn't find much to nitpick on other than two small points:

• Why are a number of lost films (along with their description) mentioned in the final paragraph of the article? It doesn't have much relevance to the film itself.

I'm a film buff. It being a lost film, I thought it would interest readers (myself included) and link to other articles on very notable missing films.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:04, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

I see. --smarojit ^HD 11:13, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

• The Lodger: A Story of the London Fog , François Truffaut and Kentucky are over-linked.

Done I think.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:04, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Other than this, I don't see why this cannot be a GA! :) --smarojit ^HD 02:37, 21 August 2013 (UTC) Thanks for the review.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:04, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

--smarojit ^HD 11:13, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Smaro!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:29, 21 August 2013 (UTC)