Talk:The Monster of Phineas-n-Ferbenstein/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

In depth review

Please place a checkmark beside the item, when it is adressed.

Prose

• Along with the separate story, "Oil on Candace"

Along with a seperate story [...]

• Written by Martin Olson and Jon Colton Barry, its storyboards

Written by Martin Olson and Jon Colton Barry, the storyboards

• To occupy the time, the doctor tells Perry of his Victorian ancestor

To occupy the time, Doofenshmirtz tells Perry of his Victorian ancestor.

In a previous line, the article talks about Dr.Phineastein. Since there are two doctors, the article needs to specify which one.

Production

• Quoation marks are not needed over every term of The Monster of Phineas-n-Ferbenstein
• The production section is weak
• There is a paragraph with just two sentences
• See the production section in Homer's Barbershop Quartet for more details.

Lead

• The paragraphs in the lead are too short.
• There are too many paragraphs for an article of this size.

This article has a few problems, which I will give one week to fix. Thanks Warrior4321 01:41, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Since no efforts were made to try and fix the article, the article has failed the good article review. warrior4321 23:19, 9 September 2009 (UTC)