Talk:The Messenger (website)
 | A fact from The Messenger (website) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 June 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 21:29, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
... that startup news website The Messenger plans to hire 550 journalists within its first year in operation?Source: Axios- ALT1: ... that the editorial staff of online news startup The Messenger includes former editors-in-chief of Gizmodo, Entertainment Weekly, People, and Self? Source: Axios
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Care cloth
Created by Red-tailed hawk (talk). Self-nominated at 17:33, 21 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/The Messenger (website); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
New enough and long enough. QPQ present. Hook fact checks out. No textual issues in Earwig. Looks good to go. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:40, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment. Striking ALT0 per WP:CRYSTALBALL; companies announce "plans" all the time that they may or may not end up fulfilling. Also, DYK is not a platform for corporate announcements per WP:NOTPROMO. But ALT1 seems ok since it's a verifiable fact that is true today. Cielquiparle (talk) 08:10, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Redlink for Jimmy Finkelstein edit
I do think that Finkelstein is notable, and that we should include a link per WP:REDYES, which says that we should [c]reate red links whenever a non-existent article with more information would help a reader understand the content of the article in which the red link will appear
. I don't understand why the redlink is being removed; that we still need to write an article on the guy isn't a reason to remove the redlink. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:19, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- Pinging Dissident93, since we've been going back-and-forth on this. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:28, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- Are there plans to create an article soon? If not, then there isn't really any point in keeping a redlink. I'm not arguing that he doesn't deserve one. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 21:37, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- The point of a redlink is so that someone goes and creates it eventually, not that an article is immediately forthcoming. I've been busy recently, and so haven't been able to get to it, but a start-class bio shouldn't be too hard to write this weekend. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 13:31, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- Are there plans to create an article soon? If not, then there isn't really any point in keeping a redlink. I'm not arguing that he doesn't deserve one. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 21:37, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
"Jimmy Finkelstein" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
The redirect Jimmy Finkelstein has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 3 § Jimmy Finkelstein until a consensus is reached. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:36, 3 August 2023 (UTC)