Talk:The Mavericks/GA1
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Kaleeb18 in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Kaleeb18 (talk · contribs) 02:22, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
I'll be picking up this article. ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 02:22, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
| |
2c. it contains no original research. |
| |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
| |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. |
@Kaleeb18: Addressing your concerns here.
- I think I got all of the 1a points. The only one I'm contesting is italicizing AllMusic and Country Standard Time. I couldn't find anything within our own manuals of style saying whether or not website names are italicized, but most offsite manuals of style agree on not italicizing website names. If you can find something saying they should be, let me know.
- As for sources:
- MusicRow has an editorial and supervising staff that includes music journalists such as Robert K. Oermann.
- The Weekly Wire source was dead so I removed that info entirely.
- I swapped Daily Country with Elmore Magazine
- I swapped Audiophile with PopMatters
Think I've got everything. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:43, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- All looks good and you seem to be correct I did not know that. The only thing I'm still seeeing is what makes Tejanonation reliable ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 12:53, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- My bad, I missed that one. Couldn't find anything better so I removed it. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 15:46, 7 June 2022 (UTC)