Talk:The Marshall Mathers LP/Archive 2

Genres

The genres are what they are, why do people keep changing them? MacMed^talk_stalk 02:40, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:The Marshall Mathers LP/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Article requirements: Y Start: reasonably complete infobox; lead section with overview of album; track listing; reference to at least primary personnel by name; Categorization by at least artist and year. Y C: all of start and (1) cover art in infobox; (2) at least one additional section of prose; (3) track lengths & song authors in tracklist; (4) a personnel section including all musicians. B: all of C and (1) most technical details in infobox; (2) technical personnel in personnel section; (3) no obvious issues with sourcing; (4) no obvious issues with readability, though it may not conform completely to style guidelines; (5) no glaring omissions of information (see some suggestions at WP:ALBUM) or extraneous information, like trivia. Higher Classes are not assigned by WikiProject Album. Please review "the perfect article" and, if already B class, consider seeking additional feedback from Wikipedia:Good articles or Wikipedia:Featured articles. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Assessment for additional information on article class. To request a reassessment from the Album project, when concerns are addressed, please see "requesting an assessment". --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:51, 30 August 2008 (UTC) ===Re-assessment=== Start class: Y A reasonably complete infobox Y A lead section giving an overview of the album Y A track listing Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient) Y Categorisation at least by artist and year C class: Y All the start class criteria Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art Y At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section) N A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs Y A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians. B class: N All the C class criteria Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details Y A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources. Y No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS This isn't a bad article. But I still wouldn't re-submit it for a GA just yet. Some paragraphs contain no citations and we still need songwriter credits for the album. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:19, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Last edited at 14:19, 4 September 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 20:52, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 28 November 2022

the genres (while they are correct, they aren't worded correctly. I would like to fix that. And that goes for a few parts in this article. I would like to fix that. 176.202.188.250 (talk) 18:49, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. RudolfRed (talk) 19:05, 28 November 2022 (UTC)