Talk:The Man Upstairs (short story collection)

Reference

The sole reference supplied is to a personal website, it is not a WP:RS. Jezhotwells (talk) 09:18, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Merge discussion

I think the plot summary of When Doctors Disagree (short story) should be merged into this stub, the same could happen to the other stories in this collection as there is no independent scholarship or commentary on the individual stories. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:12, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Actually have gone ahead and done this as the merge appears to have beenb trhe actual consensus of the Afd discussion Jezhotwells (talk) 10:25, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Requested move 27 January 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

---

• The Man Upstairs → The Man Upstairs (short story collection)
• The Man Upstairs (disambiguation) → The Man Upstairs

– No indication that this 103-year-old short story collection, which was never reprinted, is more sought after than all the other combined entries at The Man Upstairs (disambiguation) page. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 10:15, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

• Comment if moved would be most helpful to readers to go to The Man Upstairs (P. G. Wodehouse) since it is both a story and a collection. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:15, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

It should be noted that other Wodehouse collections, Nothing Serious (short story collection) or Ukridge (short story collection), do not use "(P. G. Wodehouse)" as a qualifier, nor do entries for Wodehouse's individual short stories, such as Best Seller (short story), Buried Treasure (short story), The Castaways (short story), Excelsior (short story), Monkey Business (short story) or Success Story (short story). —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 03:16, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

I'm aware of that but we're discussing this move which is both a story and a short story and a real world where The Man Upstairs (Ray Bradbury story) exists, though we haven't provided users any content other than mention in three articles.... whatever. Support as proposed. Better than current situation. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:01, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

• Support as proposed. No primary topic here,[1] and the proposed disambiguation is the one preferred by WP:BOOKDAB and usual practice.--Cúchullain ^t/c 16:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Man Upstairs (short story collection). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070217191256/http://home.earthlink.net/~nmidkiff/pgw/story.html to http://home.earthlink.net/~nmidkiff/pgw/story.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070217191256/http://home.earthlink.net/~nmidkiff/pgw/story.html to http://home.earthlink.net/~nmidkiff/pgw/story.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:24, 17 January 2018 (UTC)