A fact from The Maid of Orleans (poem) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 August 2008, and was viewed approximately 1,817 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The statement in the introduction that "It was first published in 1899" is belied by the rest of the article, which refers to a revised publication in 1762, as well as to the book's having been "banned, burned" etc during the 18th century. If the year is simply wrong, or if the author intended to state "first COMPLETE publication" or something like that, could this change be made? Chip (talk) 15:42, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Given the ambivalent reaction to his own work - re-edited and republished 1762 without the controversial content, as noted later in the article - claims by Voltaire that this was never completed should probably not be believed if they were made later in life. OTOH if he said this in, say, 1735, that's plausibly true rather than an excuse. -- PDVk (talk) 00:16, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
