This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This looks like WP:OR. It is not clear from that the source supports the "Critics do not take into account..." statement. More direct provenance for this statement needs to be supplied. Also, the extensive quote does not seem pertinent to the article in its entirety. See WP:LONGQUOTE.
--Klaun (talk) 13:41, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
@Olgama Alen:These claims require independent sourcing. They are currently sourced to (a) a book published by Theosophical Publishing House; (b) a YouTube video by the Theosophical Society; and (c) a book by Geoffrey Barborka, a prominent Theosophist. If the text is to stand, then the claims need to be properly attributed, eg. "according to Theosophical sources, a study was done by the British Museum" etc, and "Theosophical author Geoffrey Baborka claimed" etc. But in my view, if there's no independent verification available for the British Museum study at least, then it doesn't belong in the article. Sojourner in the earth (talk) 05:27, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
