Talk:The Lost Chapter of the Acts of the Apostles
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2005-10-24. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Untitled
editWHY DOES EVERY CONTROVERSIAL CHURCH DOCUMENT GET SIDELINED, NOMINATED FOR DELETION, OR OTHERWISE MARGINALIZED OUT OF THE PUBLIC VIEW? ARE ALL EARTHLING BIPEDAL HOMONIDS BLIND?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.235.44.73 (talk) 19:56, April 4, 2006 (UTC)
Because they (the Priests/Pastors/Rabbi's/etc of the Church are the same 'blind guides' reffered to by Jesus in the Gospels. Religions were invented by Satan and that is why it happens. The Church is and has always been a booming business. Jesus told us, in Matthew Chapter 6, how we should pray: In private, behind a closed door, to The Father (NOT to Jesus - read it for yourself) He also told us whom we should not be like.. the hypocrites, who love to pray standing in the churches (synagoge and church have the same meaning) to be seen by others. THAT is why, in my humble opinion, any document/discovered manuscript that teaches contrary to the view of the Church establishment gets blackholed and marginalized. It is because they (the priests/pastors, etc.) whom are still trying to be levites, even though Christ has FOREVER ABOLISHED the priesthood (he is now our High Priest and we need no man to teach us), they are AFFRAID to be exposed because the existance of the Church, as we know it, is not justified by the teachings of Jesus.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.17.140.131 (talk) 10:26, August 9, 2006 (UTC)
- So, in effect you're saying that every document which has been indicated by textual analysis as having been written several centuries after Christ, and is basically acknowledged as not being what it claims to be, is having it's non-exsistent credibility impugned by the "dishonest" people who have dedicated their lives to the study of that work and probably know it better than virtually anyone else. Rrright.... John Carter 21:55, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Name change
editI can't figure out what this should be called. Certainly 'The' doesn't belong in the title. It's a bit tricky searching as there are so many self-published books mentioning it, and some searches show books that I'm pretty sure don't contain any possible titles. The most common name, I think (and certainly in GScholar) seems to be "Sonnini Manuscript", which is a redirect. The least common seems to be "Lost chapter of the acts of the apostles". In between is "Lost Chapter of Acts". Ping @MagicatthemovieS, Good Olfactory, Editor2020, and Good Olfactory:. Doug Weller talk 15:39, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
"Lost Chapter of Acts" sounds like the best title to me, as it gives readers some idea of what the article is about. The phrase "Sonnini Manuscript" is meaningless to most people.MagicatthemovieS talk 15:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)