Talk:The Lie of the Land
Latest comment: 5 years ago by TedEdwards in topic See also Last of the Time Lords
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Lie of the Land article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trilogy edit
Just wondering, should we still be referring to these as "loosely connected"? They appear pretty sequentially coherent to me. I realize that's just an opinion but the word "trilogy" is pretty definitive and is sourced. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 06:32, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- The source does state 'This episode opened a loose three-parter billed as “The Monks Trilogy”' - but I also haven't seen any other sources call it 'The Monks Trilogy'. I'd agree with the 'loose' at this stage - but we'll see how it comes out in the wash (looking at you DWM). If I was a betting man, I think it's probably going to be classed a three-parter - but I personally see it as a single ep and then a two parter. Dresken (talk) 12:00, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
See also Last of the Time Lords edit
I think the article should have a see also link for Last of the Time Lords as it has been noted that Lie of the Land looks similar to that earlier episode. 122.106.83.10 (talk) 10:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: Discussion at Talk:Last of the Time Lords --TedEdwards 13:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)