Talk:The Legend of Korra/GA1
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Obtund (talk · contribs) 18:24, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Status
editThis section is supposed to be edited only by reviewer(s). Any questions and comments concerning this table should be posed in Discussion subsection below.
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
| |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
| |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
| |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. |
Discussion
editPlease refer to issue by numbers. Eg., the second issue with 1a criterion is 1a2.
- I disagree with the assessment at 3b that the ratings subsection is unneeded. Ratings are an important aspect of a TV show and belong into the main article. I've reinserted the respective section, if not the graphic. I also don't think that the summary coverage of the book 1 plot needs to go into any more detail, as is suggested for 3a. Sandstein 21:09, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- As regards 5, there are unclosed RfCs on the talk page regarding article organization. Sandstein 21:10, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- I'm ambivalent about the ratings section, so whatever you guys decide. But for the RFCs, the episode list doesn't concern this article and the italics RFC is pretty much closed (the only editor opposing italics is Light2Shadow). Only major pending change in the article is possible reversion of the characters section, which I do not see happening unless somebody comes up with an out-of-universe character list (not the previous crap that was in the article). Finally, as for the other changes (prose, etc.), I'll work on that ASAP. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 23:43, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- What you did about 3b is fine. 3a is missing vital information on how the show starts. That needs to be there. If the RFCs are not taken care of, the article may be defined as unstable so get them done ASAP. ObtundTalk 01:30, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- I'm going to work on 3a later today (shouldn't be more than a sentence or two). — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 15:59, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, just say something like tenzin came to the southern water tribe and left and then korra snuck on a boat and went to republic city, and then see meet Beifong. ObtundTalk 19:21, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- I'm going to work on 3a later today (shouldn't be more than a sentence or two). — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 15:59, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- What you did about 3b is fine. 3a is missing vital information on how the show starts. That needs to be there. If the RFCs are not taken care of, the article may be defined as unstable so get them done ASAP. ObtundTalk 01:30, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- OK, added that and also added the brief intro to the characters section. Hopefully things are OK now. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:23, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Fixed a number of the prose issues. I didn't fix 4, 12, and 13 because they are correct in their current form (expln: would create a fragmented verb clause; both ambitious and charismatic are adj. of politician, and so the article belongs to the entire phrase; the noun of the sentence is "elements", which is plural). Still have to work on 7. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 00:02, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- 4. It says, "Bending is carried out using spiritual and physical exercises, portrayed in the series as similar to Chinese and other Asian martial arts." it should be "Bending is carried out using spiritual and physical exercises, which are portrayed in the series as similar to Chinese and other Asian martial arts." This is my error as I wrote my comment incorrectly. I have updated the above to comply. ObtundTalk 01:36, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, OK. Just fixed in the article. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 15:59, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment:The insertion of "which are" is not wrong, but, Obtund, it is not necessary. It was a perfectly correct participial phrase. --Stfg (talk) 08:12, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, OK. Just fixed in the article. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 15:59, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- 12. Agreed - ObtundTalk 01:40, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- 13. Agreed - My error. ObtundTalk 02:53, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Did you ever forget to fail the article when the 3-day time limit's up? 71.142.234.34 (talk) 23:20, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- No I did not, the edits were being taken care of, and there were some issues to be discussed. ObtundTalk 23:37, 24 August 2012 (UTC)