Talk:The Leader (web series)/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Some Dude From North Carolina in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 12:52, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:52, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • Improve the non-free use rationale for the poster with this template.
  • The infobox itself, on the other hand, appears to be missing several parameters, such as "language" and "voices".
    • Added "language" (although I didn't do it before since its quite redundant); and I don't have the information on the voice actors to include it (no sources provide as far as I can tell). Gabriel Yuji (talk) 03:04, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • The word "intellectual" doesn't seem neutral. Try describing who Karl Marx was instead.
  • Add a serial comma after "propagandism".

Plot edit

  • Again, change "intellectual" per WP:NPOV.
  • The phrase "and leaving of" sounds off as it splits the sentence. Try rewording.
  • Remove the comma after "with his death".

Production edit

Broadcast edit

  • "social-media" → "social media"
  • "more-serious" → "more serious"
  • Is there a word missing between "about political economy"?
    • No. Is it sounding strange to you? The article by Engels that Marx reads is about political economy. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 03:04, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
A little bit, yes, but no worries as it's still readable. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:37, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Reception edit

  • In the text and in the reference by her, change "Millingan" to "Milligan".
  • Similar issue, but change "Fanzoni" to "Fantoni"

References edit

  • Archive all archivable sources (either manually or with this tool).

Progress edit

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·