Talk:The Last: Naruto the Movie

ISBN

I have combined four references into one, adding the rp termplate to show the page names. I've also added "|ignore-isbn-error=true" to the first use because it was throwing an error. (That's the reason I'm here, btw.) When the ISBN is right, the "ignore" item can be removed.--Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 00:38, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Last: Naruto the Movie/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 23:34, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

I will review this article. Thank you.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 23:34, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Comments

• "set between chapters 699 and 700 of the manga series." — Wikilink the manga series to "List of Naruto volumes".
• "as they go on a mission to rescue Hanabi Hyuga from a man known as Toneri Otsutsuki." — You can explain a bit about his agenda in the lead.
• "he overall enjoyed seeing them" — You can either remove the "overall" word or rephrase it as "he enjoyed seeing the output." For both the lead and the image caption in the production section.
• "Naruto saves Hinata from the ceremony" — Meaning the ceremony where Toneri plans to unleash the Tenseigan.
• The "Production" title can be changed to "Production and release" as some of the information on the film's release is mentioned here. Either that or "Reception" can be changed to "Release and reception" and you move the release details there.
• The image use rationale descriptions don't seem to be that good. It might be prone to deletion. You can use my image: File:Padayappa Swing Scene.jpg as reference.
• "It contains homages to Jun'ichirō Tanizaki's In Praise of Shadows, Vincent van Gogh's The Starry Night, Alfred Hitchcock’s Vertigo and Nobuhiko Obayashi's Lonely Heart." — Write the year of release for the last two, Vertigo and Lonely Heart. The current link for Vertigo redirects to the mental condition and not the film.
• "she thought the character was cold" can be changed to "she thought the character behaved rather coldly".
• "Two additional CDs were The Host: Naruto the CD and Even in a Future Day." — source?
• In the critical response section, you can combine all the critical feedback on Toneri as an unmemorable character into one single paragraph.
• Change the isbn in ref no 8 to isbn-13 ("978-" thingy).
• Publisher/work for ref no 14 is listed as Otaku USA Magazine while in ref no 32, it is "Otaku USA" without italics. Change both to simply Otaku USA with italics.

That's about it from me. Nice work on the article Flowerpiep and Tintor2. Resolve the comments and the article is promoted.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 08:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

@Ssven2: Hello and thank you for providing the review. I tried to fix everything that you had mentioned above except for one matter. Regarding this: "Change the isbn in ref no 6 to isbn-13 ("978-" thingy).", aren't you actually referring to the 6th reference (since the 8th reference does not contain an ISBN)? If this is the case, the problem is that, from what I understood, The Last's Program Guide does not have an actual ISBN. What appears there in the reference is a code written on one of the guide's pages (it is not its ISBN), and this is why "ignore-isbn-error=true" was added in the reference.

Two more mentions:

The "Reception" section already contained a subsection called "Box office and release", so I removed the information from the "Production" section regarding the film's release and I added it to this subsection (which I renamed "Release and box office"). Is this okay?

Besides writing a separate paragraph regarding the fact that Toneri was viewed as an unmemorable character, I further reorganised the reception section and added topic sentences to each paragraph in order to obtain a better flow. I hope it is all right. Flowerpiep (talk) 14:31, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Flowerpiep

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.

   Pass or Fail:

Thank you for addressing my comments, Flowerpiep and Tintor2. Congratulations, the article has passed.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 15:48, 21 April 2018 (UTC)