Talk:The Lacemaker (Vermeer)

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Thoosidadeez in topic Incorrect(?) Analysis of Netscher's The Lacemaker

Incorrect(?) Analysis of Netscher's The Lacemaker

edit

The article implies one of the sources cited for Netscher's The Lacemaker identifies parts of the painting as being sexual allusions. (Citation 5, http://www.essentialvermeer.com/cat_about/lacemkr.html).

However, this doesn't seem to be the case after reading that citation. Should it be removed? Thoosidadeez (talk) 19:57, 28 July 2011 (UTC)ThoosidadeezReply