Talk:The Kiss (Munch)/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Crisco 1492 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Viriditas (talk · contribs) 19:26, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


Note: per the article talk page, nominator is not a contributor to this article. Viriditas (talk) 19:26, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Criteria

edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:  
    Best practice is to cite and attribute quotes directly after the quote, not necessarily at the end of the paragraph. Viriditas (talk) 23:51, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
    Fixed. Viriditas (talk) 00:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused (see summary style):  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Basic copyedits. Amazing images. Good to go. Viriditas (talk) 00:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply