Talk:The Jesus Papers
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
[Untitled] edit
I fixed a spelling error. No content altered.
One would hope that Wikipedia articles dealing with books confine themselves to the straightforward and objective (NPOV) presentation of the book's contents and a bit about the author(s), but it doesn't seem to be the case here. This article is three paragraphs in length, but the second two appear to question the author's motives and cast doubts as to his credibility--they have little if anything to do with the book itself. Even the first paragraph, which appears to be a short abstract of the book's contents, uses the words "conspirational," "pseudohistory" and a misplaced use of the word "alleged"--words which, however unfairly, have a negative connotation.
Can someone summarize briefly the contents of the book? It seems all that was written about was the criticism the book received! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.35.54.66 (talk) 17:29, 13 August 2008 (UTC) The REAL truth is when you follow the money and power. If Jesus lived to 80yrs, then christianity would be shown as a lie, and all the churches would crumble when reality set in. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nashka (talk • contribs) 13:20, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Baigent's friend edit
Is there anything to indicate that Baigent's friend who according to Baigent will release them after 25 years (from when?) exists, or what the Pope is supposed to have said about the papers was said? All according to Baigent I suppose. Hugo999 (talk) 13:21, 31 December 2011 (UTC)