Talk:The Invisible Man (film series)/GA1

Latest comment: 9 months ago by Adamstom.97 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Adamstom.97 (talk · contribs) 00:35, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I am planning to review this article for GA over the coming days. I am a little concerned about the scope and size of the article so expect to have a discussion about that. - adamstom97 (talk) 00:35, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sure! This is my first article on a film series, but I'm happy to address anything needed. Andrzejbanas (talk) 01:28, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
After reviewing the article and talk page I think I am happy with the scope of the article though it is still on the smaller size. One big structural thing I do think would make sense would be to include a summary section for each film similar to Mission: Impossible (film series) or Fast & Furious, as long as the details in each one are sourced. If you could look into doing that and let me know, then I will go through any other specific changes I think are needed for the existing content. - adamstom97 (talk) 02:11, 6 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Great! I was wondering if that was the main major thing you felt was missing. I've added them now. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:05, 6 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
That looks good, thanks. I just have a few more things to address:
  • Can you please clarify the timeframe for "any immediate remakes"?
  • The sources basically says the same thing. I've tried to re-phrase that to make it less vague. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:22, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • There are also a few typos in the Legacy section where the wrong word or punctuation appears to have been used, can you please do a once-over?
  • There are a couple web sources without archives, there is some inconsistency in the names used for sources such as Deadline vs. Deadline Hollywood, and some missing links in sources.
Let me know when these have been addressed. - adamstom97 (talk) 00:39, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • I think that is all of them @Adamstom.97:. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:22, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
    Good work cleaning up those few things, and I appreciate the effort to have a good article about such old films (considering the focus on newer projects that WP:FILM tends to have). I am now happy to   pass this review. Congratulations. - adamstom97 (talk) 22:04, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply