Talk:The Hundred of Hoo Academy

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 10:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Changes March 2011

The article has been considerably updated. This is to include new information and to cite sources ( the previous article had no sources). Also language has been changed so that the article is of encyclopaedic style rather than an advertisement.Dlangers (talk) 19:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC). Much work is still needed possibly with a slimmed down article removing the more 'newsletter' like elements. Dlangers (talk) 23:18, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Malicious Changes

Deletions are being made without stated reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moz1992 (talk • contribs) 20:39, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

I removed the content, citing BLP issues. The sources given are not adequate for the claims made. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:01, 23 March 2011 (UTC).

The source is a national newspaper which clearly names the school additionally a local paper carriers the same story. http://www.kentonline.co.uk/medway_messenger/news/2011/march/21/teacher_arrested.aspx

What additional evidence would be required?Moz1992 (talk) 21:13, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

information added with no danger of issues with BLP Moz1992 (talk) 21:37, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Disputed section

I have taken the disputed section to the The Hundred of Hoo Academy/sandbox. Reversions without reading the changes don't work. They waste time, and destroy interpersonal relations. The material that was included in the staff handbook (which I cannot find at the moment) is a suscinct history of the effect reorganisations on a volatile community. Google searches are almost a waste of time as they just refer back. I left a detailed comment in my last edit summary that was blocked by an edit conflict - but the middle paragraphs are over detailed, and when referenced they need to be rewritten. I wont be on this page till late tomorrow- real life commitments. ClemRutter (talk) 00:49, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

The school has had many lives, driven by external changes- so I have had another go, and split this the section and added geographic context. From 2012 we have two GOOD Ofsteds. A way forward maybe. --ClemRutter (talk) 17:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

KS3 , KS4, KS5 curriculums in place. As the school is moving toward being an all-through school adding the 1 FE primary classes is a challenge. We are missing ten years of recent history and building. All the IB is a bonus and the Ofsteds have unexploited referenced. ClemRutter (talk) 18:12, 30 January 2021 (UTC)