This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
There appears to be some disagreement over whether The Howling III: Echoes was a reboot of the Howling series of books. The fact is it was indeed a reboot, and I would recommend that people who disagree should read Wikipedia's reboot article and also the Howling novels themselves. The Howling III uses the basic premise from the first Howling novel, but changes the events and times that happen in it to establish a new continuity. That is what a reboot is. None of the characters from the original Howling novel (or The Howling II) are present in The Howling III, nor are they even mentioned. The town of Drago is mentioned as is the neighbouring town of Pinyon, but that's all. 88.104.23.72 (talk) 23:56, 12 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
It seems we've gone around about this again. The easiest way to settle all of this is to simply add reliable secondary sources showing the matter is referred to as a reboot. In fact, I've added the unsourced tag to this page, as there doesn't appear to be a single source involved in the article, which makes the entire thing unsourced. Dayewalker (talk) 18:43, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
For the vast majority of the article, the book itself is the source. The book covers the plot, author, year of publishing, publishing house, ISDN number, etc. The book, once compared to the first two books in the series, makes it what is now known as a reboot, and the continuities section of the article explains this quite clearly. Since the book is now over a quarter of a century old, there aren't going to be many sources beyond that of fan-run websites. The author himself does not have an official website. However, it seems to me that there is only one editor who has a problem with the word "reboot" being used (IP user:24.129.175.63), and that editor has a history of being an incredibly problematic and beligerent person, not just on this article but on lots of others (have you seen the volume of complaints on their talk page?). Other editors on The Howling article pages have agreed that this book is a reboot, so why we should be trying to placate the IP editor (who has so far flatly refused to enter into any discussion about the matter and insists on hurling abuse at other editors in his edit summaries) is beyond me. 88.104.24.78 (talk) 00:56, 18 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
If you want the page to be protected, make your request at WP:RFP. The {{Edit semi-protected}} tag is to request edits to a page that is already semi-protected. RudolfRed (talk) 20:28, 29 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
