Talk:The Harrowing (Inside No. 9)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 21:35, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

• I'll take this one within the week. 23W 21:35, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks- it's appreciated! J Milburn (talk) 14:46, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

What a terrifying-sounding episode.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Duplication Detector spotchecks turned up nothin'.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Great article! Couldn't find much of anything wrong, which is no surprise, considering you've probably perfected the format with the other GANs for the series. Pass! 23W 20:58, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, thoroughly appreciated. Any comments, no matter how taxing, picky or small, are welcome. J Milburn (talk) 21:14, 29 July 2014 (UTC)