Talk:The Goon

Latest comment: 7 months ago by Bloodshot64 in topic Editing genre's

Alternate 30's

edit

Does The Goon really take place in an alternate 30's? Is there exacting evidence? Even the automobiles don't fit this.

I'm gonna try chaning it to an "Unspecified time during the classic noir era (1940-1958)."

Gnrlotto 02:50, December 22, 2005

Movies made in "classic noir era" do not necessarily take place during that time. Audioweevil 02:58, 11 March 2007 (UTC)Reply


Chinatown

edit

I have removed unsubstantiated claims that the references to Chinatown in The Goon are in fact references to Roman Polanski's film. There is simply no evidence to support this, especially considering a graphic novel is currently in production entitled 'Chinatown' that explains the events referenced. Audioweevil 09:11, 3 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

The fact that he peppers his comics with movie references to films is not in contention (otherwise you'd have removed the mentions of Blue Velvet). Moving on, the article doesn't imply that the comic metafictionally references the movie, "Chinatown," only that the Goon's constant references to a bad thing happening with a woman and and it being a place he never wants to speak about are blatant references to identical events in the film itself. Thusly, whether or not Powell is writing what happened in Chinatown to Goon, the mentions of it are nudging-winks to Polanski's film.Gnrlotto 04:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I think you are approaching the topic with a very simplistic view of self-referential pop culture. Of course I do not overlook the fact that the inclusion of the topic is an unavoidable reference to the movie's iconic plot and atmosphere (e.g. Moe in the Simpsons, "It's Chinatown"), however in your reedit, you refer to Goon's past as including "similar events" to those that take place in the film, which is utterly unfounded. The idea that something in Goon's past can include a woman (their population being roughly 60% of the world's) and occurring in a place called Chinatown (of which there are dozens in North America) cannot exist without refering wholeheartedly to the film's plot is simply untrue. Your implied association of this reference with that alluding to Blue Velvet further condemns your analysis as elementary due to the profound divergence in weight of the references: that of Chinatown being highly abstract while that of Blue Velvet being a quite obvious reproduction of the character Frank. In conclusion, I think it fair to include Chinatown as a refernce in the most superficial sense, however I simply do agree with the heavy wording of your edit. I hope there is a third opinion out there that will post. I will reserve any editing until that time. Audioweevil 05:22, 29 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Instead of saying the it references the events, why not just say it's a reference, period? Is that so hard, and worth making an angry edit?71.177.82.26 22:51, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

The important point that my edit implies is not whether or not the comic references the movie (because it most certainly does), but rather whether the reference entails that the actual plot of The Goon is affected by this reference. We cannot know definitively whether this is true, so it must remain potential. Audioweevil 05:41, 8 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Comic Reality

edit

"On more than one occasion Powell has metafictionally hinted that The Goon is indeed only a comic and that its reality exists as a comic reality instead of the comic implying (like Spider-Man or Superman) that it is taking place in the "real" world."

To whomever wrote this. This statement needs at least one reference as well as some cleaning up as it makes little sense. Removed until fixed. Audioweevil 03:04, 11 March 2007 (UTC)Reply


Setting

edit

I removed the following section from the lead of the article:

Though the story is set in the US, it is not set in a named locale and rarely references any real-world people or events. It also takes place in an undefined period of time, with discrepancies including cars from the earlier half of the 20th century but more contemporary references such as Frank from Blue Velvet.

I did this for two reasons. Firstly, because as the lead is supposed to give a brief overview, it's not the right place to dissect something in detail. Secondly, in any case, discussion of when and where it is set is unverifiable speculation and original research, so shouldn't be there at all. Likewise, the same applies to any claim of there being Blue Velvet references - without a reference for this, it has no place in the article. H. Carver 12:00, 28 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Goon Noir

edit

Is 'Goon Noir' considered an official part of Goon continuity? I know, but considering the Goon it's a possibillity it ain't.

And I feel that the article could be improved by stressing Goon and Franky's brutallity. They are -not- nice people. Smashing an innocent grocer's leg for missing a protection payment is common for them.Lots42 21:06, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

"Controversy"?

edit

Erm...
I'm not saying you shouldn't include any mention of this PR stunt in the article, but it seems inappropriate to refer to it as a "controversy", particularly right in the section heading. I mean, it was a 'controversy' created by an imagined person, right?
Frankly, I think that Controversy is the part that most deserves to be in quotation marks. 139.57.100.104 (talk) 02:01, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

No character entries for The Goon or Franky

edit

The "main character" section links to Characters of the Goon, but that article is only about the minor and recurring characters, and not the big two. I don't know enough about the series to write the entry myself, so I'm pointing it out instead. ShaleZero (talk) 06:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Publication history?

edit

This is embarrassing. It looks like it was written by a 8 year old. What exactly is a "Frist app."? and naming "I talked to someone" as a source in the article is so far below any sort of standard that is accepted on Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.145.31.10 (talk) 01:56, 21 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Thegoonimage.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Thegoonimage.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:52, 9 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on The Goon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:32, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Article ordering and content problems

edit

The article is now front-loaded with some huge charts. The bibliographic information of collected editions should be at the end of the article. The huge table of all the individual issues should be deleted. Though I appreciate the work behind it, it is bloated and distracting, and detracts from the entry as an encyclopedic entry. I haven't seen any table like this on any other comics pages. I would aim to remove the issues table and move the bibliographic information back to where it belongs, but as this would be a major change to the article I am raising it here first in case anyone disagrees with me and believes I should leave the article as it is. H. Carver (talk) 04:12, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Editing genre's

edit

I am trying to change the humor/comedy and horror genres to a fusion of literary concepts so it reads Comedy horror. But for some reason, it doesn't want to pop right. Even when I try changing it to first and putting crime second, all it reads is a blank. Can someone help me out with this?--Bloodshot64 (talk) 16:26, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply