Talk:The Godfather (film series)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Expand
editThis article should be expanded to discuss not just the film trilogy, but the franchise as a whole, after all, it did not begin with the films. Charles Essie (talk) 21:32, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- Nobody asserted it did begin with the films. There is a page for the book series. And the stories are quite different. Is it worth making one page for both the films and the books? Well, I guess, probably, but right now, the book page covers that role. Iunno, thought I'd say that. Daniel J. Hakimi (talk) 22:51, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- There isn't a page for the book series, but there should be, and I agree there should also be "franchise article", that's really all I wanted anyway. Charles Essie (talk) 22:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Connie Corleone Page Missing
editI just submitted a new page to Wikipedia for Connie Corleone. Why did it not already exist? Apparently, she wasn't a very important character in the books... still. That's odd. Daniel J. Hakimi (talk) 22:47, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- @DanHakimi: It was deleted: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connie Corleone. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 00:34, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- ... what? I'm trying to understand how in the world Connie is less significant than... Carmela Corleone, Sandra Corleone, Lucy Mancini, Willi Cicci... Oh, wow, the list of characters who are so insignificant yet have their own wikipedia pages is a mile and three-quarters long, yet Connie, one of the most important characters in the film series, doesn't get her own? I don't mean to imply that mistakes elsewhere mean we should make a mistake here, but I really think this decision has to have been made in error. I could cite things like this article, but I don't really want to fight you here -- how can I appeal this decision properly? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanHakimi (talk • contribs) 20:01, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on The Godfather (film series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120308111813/http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/entertainment/articles/2011-03/15/gq-film-godfather-part-four/mario-puzo to http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/entertainment/articles/2011-03/15/gq-film-godfather-part-four/mario-puzo
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:37, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:23, 8 February 2022 (UTC)